<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Double Standard of the Day</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.faithandfacts.com/double-standards/double-standard-of-the-day/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.faithandfacts.com/double-standards/double-standard-of-the-day/</link>
	<description>Exploring the intersectio between personal faith and public life.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 15:59:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr.Bruce</title>
		<link>http://www.faithandfacts.com/double-standards/double-standard-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-329</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr.Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 20:54:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.faithandfacts.com/?p=709#comment-329</guid>
		<description>Hi Nicholas,

Yes the worldview of this author is caring, Christian and generally conservative. However, the premise of this article stands on its own. Two politicians demonstrated the same behavior is nearly identical circumstances. A new commentator criticized one and chastised the other.

Isn&#039;t that the very definition of a &#039;Double Standard&#039;? Of course it is.

BTW, I have been critical of such bias in conservatives as well.

Thanks for your input.
Blessings!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Nicholas,</p>
<p>Yes the worldview of this author is caring, Christian and generally conservative. However, the premise of this article stands on its own. Two politicians demonstrated the same behavior is nearly identical circumstances. A new commentator criticized one and chastised the other.</p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t that the very definition of a &#8216;Double Standard&#8217;? Of course it is.</p>
<p>BTW, I have been critical of such bias in conservatives as well.</p>
<p>Thanks for your input.<br />
Blessings!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bosco</title>
		<link>http://www.faithandfacts.com/double-standards/double-standard-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-328</link>
		<dc:creator>Bosco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 14:52:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.faithandfacts.com/?p=709#comment-328</guid>
		<description>Of course we can&#039;t follow W. further, he can&#039;t run again.  Duh.  Socialism isn&#039;t a fresh new perspective.  And my goodness aren&#039;t you so superior.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course we can&#8217;t follow W. further, he can&#8217;t run again.  Duh.  Socialism isn&#8217;t a fresh new perspective.  And my goodness aren&#8217;t you so superior.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David McKibben</title>
		<link>http://www.faithandfacts.com/double-standards/double-standard-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-327</link>
		<dc:creator>David McKibben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 14:43:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.faithandfacts.com/?p=709#comment-327</guid>
		<description>Me thinks thou doth protest too much!

Since we cannot continue on the path we currently follow with W. at the helm, we must get a fresh new perspective to allow this country to regain its dignity and standing in the world.

Given the content of this website, I doubt you would understand the concept. We don&#039;t need a &quot;maverick&quot;. We need serious change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Me thinks thou doth protest too much!</p>
<p>Since we cannot continue on the path we currently follow with W. at the helm, we must get a fresh new perspective to allow this country to regain its dignity and standing in the world.</p>
<p>Given the content of this website, I doubt you would understand the concept. We don&#8217;t need a &#8220;maverick&#8221;. We need serious change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bosco</title>
		<link>http://www.faithandfacts.com/double-standards/double-standard-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-326</link>
		<dc:creator>Bosco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 14:35:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.faithandfacts.com/?p=709#comment-326</guid>
		<description>Nicholas, at least they have standards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nicholas, at least they have standards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicholas</title>
		<link>http://www.faithandfacts.com/double-standards/double-standard-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-325</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicholas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 14:31:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.faithandfacts.com/?p=709#comment-325</guid>
		<description>This is a conservative christian website? And you talk about double standards? Interesting indeed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a conservative christian website? And you talk about double standards? Interesting indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

