<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Faith and Facts &#187; Democrats</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.faithandfacts.com/category/democrats/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.faithandfacts.com</link>
	<description>Exploring the intersection of personal faith and public life.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 18:09:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>al-GAYda &#8211; eHarmony Settles</title>
		<link>http://www.faithandfacts.com/2008/11/21/al-gayda-eharmony-settles/</link>
		<comments>http://www.faithandfacts.com/2008/11/21/al-gayda-eharmony-settles/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 18:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr.Bruce</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homosexuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>

	<!-- AutoMeta Start -->
	<category>eHarmony</category>
	<category>Warren</category>
	<category>Clark</category>
	<category>Christian</category>
	<category>website</category>
	<category>church</category>
	<category>sin</category>
	<category>marriage</category>
	<category>lawsuit</category>
	<category>prop</category>
	<category>8</category>
	<category>anti gay</category>
	<category>anti lesbian</category>
	<category>traditional</category>
	<category>conservative</category>
	<!-- AutoMeta End -->
	
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.faithandfacts.com/?p=1591</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
It appears eHarmony will have to change their entire business model in the face of lawsuits charging them with discrimination. eHarmony has been sued by a lesbian woman seeking to be matched with another women as well as a married man seeking an adulterous match. The latest lawsuit is a class-action suit in &#8230; California.
Neil [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.faithandfacts.com/2008/11/21/al-gayda-eharmony-settles/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Voting For McCain is Racist</title>
		<link>http://www.faithandfacts.com/2008/10/15/voting-for-mccain-is-racists/</link>
		<comments>http://www.faithandfacts.com/2008/10/15/voting-for-mccain-is-racists/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 20:53:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr.Bruce</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Double Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racism]]></category>

	<!-- AutoMeta Start -->
	<category>racism</category>
	<category>racist</category>
	<category>Obama</category>
	<category>vote</category>
	<category>voting</category>
	<category>America</category>
	<category>double</category>
	<category>standard</category>
	<!-- AutoMeta End -->
	
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.faithandfacts.com/2008/10/15/voting-for-mccain-is-racists/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal has an excellent article that reflects my concerns over the Democrats persistent use of the race card. I am exhausted by the repetitive, unsubstantiated charges of racism against John McCain’s campaign specifically and Republicans in general. Anyone not voting for Obama must be a racist.
Things are supposed to be looking rosy [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.faithandfacts.com/2008/10/15/voting-for-mccain-is-racists/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Online Voter Registration</title>
		<link>http://www.faithandfacts.com/2008/10/10/online-voter-registration/</link>
		<comments>http://www.faithandfacts.com/2008/10/10/online-voter-registration/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 00:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr.Bruce</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[registration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voter]]></category>

	<!-- AutoMeta Start -->
	<category>online</category>
	<category>voter</category>
	<category>registration</category>
	<category>register</category>
	<category>vote</category>
	<category>fraud</category>
	<category>attorney</category>
	<category>Barack</category>
	<category>Obama</category>
	<category>election</category>
	<category>John</category>
	<category>McCain</category>
	<category>voting</category>
	<!-- AutoMeta End -->
	
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.faithandfacts.com/?p=927</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
I am praying that over 150,000,000 people will register and vote in this election season. The opportunity to vote is both a right and a privilege. With the advent of the Internet, online voter registration is easier than ever. While concerns over voter fraud have attorneys piling up the fees, it should not keep anyone [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.faithandfacts.com/2008/10/10/online-voter-registration/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ACORN and Voter Registration Fraud</title>
		<link>http://www.faithandfacts.com/2008/10/10/acorn-and-voter-registration-fraud/</link>
		<comments>http://www.faithandfacts.com/2008/10/10/acorn-and-voter-registration-fraud/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 19:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr.Bruce</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voting]]></category>

	<!-- AutoMeta Start -->
	<category>voter</category>
	<category>fraud</category>
	<category>registration</category>
	<category>Barack</category>
	<category>Obama</category>
	<category>ACORN</category>
	<category>Ohio</category>
	<category>Nevada</category>
	<category>election</category>
	<category>online</category>
	<!-- AutoMeta End -->
	
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.faithandfacts.com/?p=874</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ACORN&#8217;s Voter registration efforts have been at the center of fraud allegations in as many as 15 states.  Democrats have tried to deflect these allegations. Matt Griffin, Nevada&#8217;s deputy secretary of state for elections, said, &#8220;An ongoing probe in Nevada into the group responsible for collecting the registrations, the Association of Community Organizations for Reform [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.faithandfacts.com/2008/10/10/acorn-and-voter-registration-fraud/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Makes False Claim to Cut Spending</title>
		<link>http://www.faithandfacts.com/2008/10/08/obama-makes-false-claim-to-cut-spending/</link>
		<comments>http://www.faithandfacts.com/2008/10/08/obama-makes-false-claim-to-cut-spending/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 21:43:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr.Bruce</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Double Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Bias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subprime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[truth]]></category>

	<!-- AutoMeta Start -->
	<category>Barack</category>
	<category>Obama</category>
	<category>election</category>
	<category>2008</category>
	<category>voter</category>
	<category>registration</category>
	<category>spending</category>
	<category>deficit</category>
	<category>false</category>
	<category>lie</category>
	<category>truth</category>
	<category>online</category>
	<!-- AutoMeta End -->
	
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.faithandfacts.com/2008/10/08/obama-makes-false-claim-to-cut-spending/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Only in the weird world of Quantum Mechanics can math like this be explained. The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, an independent, group analyzed Obama&#8217;s tax and spending plans.
They result in a net increase of spending of $281 billion.
The claim that, &#8220;Actually I&#8217;m cutting more than I&#8217;m spending so that it will be a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.faithandfacts.com/2008/10/08/obama-makes-false-claim-to-cut-spending/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gwen Ifill Seemed Fair</title>
		<link>http://www.faithandfacts.com/2008/10/03/gwen-ifill-seemed-fair/</link>
		<comments>http://www.faithandfacts.com/2008/10/03/gwen-ifill-seemed-fair/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 12:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr.Bruce</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Double Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Bias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Double Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberals]]></category>

	<!-- AutoMeta Start -->
	<category>Gwen</category>
	<category>Ifill</category>
	<category>Palin</category>
	<category>Biden</category>
	<category>debate</category>
	<category>VP</category>
	<category>vice</category>
	<category>president</category>
	<category>moderator</category>
	<category>Age</category>
	<category>of</category>
	<category>Obama</category>
	<!-- AutoMeta End -->
	
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.faithandfacts.com/?p=704</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I posted a lengthy article about the appropriateness of Gwen Ifill serving as moderator for the VP debate. She has a real, not just apparent, conflict of interest with her new book lauding the &#8220;Age of Obama.&#8221; Liberals would never accept this conflict if the situation was reversed. Say if Rush Limbaugh were hosting a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.faithandfacts.com/2008/10/03/gwen-ifill-seemed-fair/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Blame Game</title>
		<link>http://www.faithandfacts.com/2008/10/02/the-blame-game/</link>
		<comments>http://www.faithandfacts.com/2008/10/02/the-blame-game/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 16:14:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr.Bruce</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subprime]]></category>

	<!-- AutoMeta Start -->
	<category>Freddie</category>
	<category>Fannie</category>
	<category>banking</category>
	<category>mortgage</category>
	<category>crisis</category>
	<category>lending</category>
	<category>Democrats</category>
	<category>blame</category>
	<category>fault</category>
	<category>financial</category>
	<category>stock</category>
	<category>market</category>
	<category>Barack</category>
	<category>Obama</category>
	<category>election</category>
	<!-- AutoMeta End -->
	
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.faithandfacts.com/2008/10/02/the-blame-game/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Democrats have been denying that they are the primary cause of the Fannie and Freddie fiascos. Even Bill Clinton admits that there needed to be greater regulatory controls and key Dems consistently fought against them. Listen to Cal Thomas:

When Speaker Nancy Pelosi took to the floor of the House on Monday to blame Republicans [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.faithandfacts.com/2008/10/02/the-blame-game/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Let Limbaugh Moderate The Next Presidential Debate</title>
		<link>http://www.faithandfacts.com/2008/10/01/let-limbaugh-moderate-the-next-presidential-debate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.faithandfacts.com/2008/10/01/let-limbaugh-moderate-the-next-presidential-debate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 13:14:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr.Bruce</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Double Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Double Standard]]></category>

	<!-- AutoMeta Start -->
	<category>Obama</category>
	<category>Gwen</category>
	<category>Ifill</category>
	<category>debates</category>
	<category>vice president</category>
	<category>double</category>
	<category>standard</category>
	<category>Limbaugh</category>
	<category>media</category>
	<category>bias</category>
	<category>double</category>
	<category>standard</category>
	<!-- AutoMeta End -->
	
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.faithandfacts.com/2008/10/01/let-limbaugh-moderate-the-next-presidential-debate/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I suggest we ask Rush Limbaugh to &#8216;moderate&#8217; the next Presidential Debate. He does not have a book coming out on McCain. He has been a harsh critic of McCain at times. While he is a vocal conservative, he would add a good balance to the the line-up of Moderators we have this season. Compare [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.faithandfacts.com/2008/10/01/let-limbaugh-moderate-the-next-presidential-debate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pelosi Allows Dems To Vote No</title>
		<link>http://www.faithandfacts.com/2008/09/30/pelosi-allows-dems-to-vote-no/</link>
		<comments>http://www.faithandfacts.com/2008/09/30/pelosi-allows-dems-to-vote-no/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 17:19:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr.Bruce</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pork]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subprime]]></category>

	<!-- AutoMeta Start -->
	<category>Pelosi</category>
	<category>Obama</category>
	<category>Fannie</category>
	<category>Freddie</category>
	<category>crisis</category>
	<category>banking</category>
	<category>lending</category>
	<category>mortgage</category>
	<category>finances</category>
	<category>economics</category>
	<category>Bush</category>
	<category>vote</category>
	<category>Democrats</category>
	<!-- AutoMeta End -->
	
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.faithandfacts.com/2008/09/30/pelosi-allows-dems-to-vote-no/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Why did 94 Democrats vote against the bailout? Take a look at Bill Dyer&#8217;s analysis:
I thought it was bad enough that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi had made a deliberate decision not to make today&#8217;s vote on the Democrat&#8217;s economic stabilization bill a &#8220;party loyalty&#8221; vote in which the House Democratic leadership made absolutely clear that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.faithandfacts.com/2008/09/30/pelosi-allows-dems-to-vote-no/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Democrats Kill Bailout</title>
		<link>http://www.faithandfacts.com/2008/09/29/democrats-kill-bailout/</link>
		<comments>http://www.faithandfacts.com/2008/09/29/democrats-kill-bailout/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 21:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr.Bruce</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subprime]]></category>

	<!-- AutoMeta Start -->
	<category>bailout</category>
	<category>lending</category>
	<category>banking</category>
	<category>crisis</category>
	<category>Democrats</category>
	<category>Obama</category>
	<category>Pelosi</category>
	<category>Republicans</category>
	<category>Bush</category>
	<category>700</category>
	<category>billion</category>
	<category>housing</category>
	<category>mortgage</category>
	<category>Fannie</category>
	<category>Freddie</category>
	<!-- AutoMeta End -->
	
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.faithandfacts.com/2008/09/29/democrats-kill-bailout/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The bailout was killed by House Democrats. Yes, Democrats. Losing by a margin of 228-205, the measure only needed 12 members to change their minds.
95 Democrats voted against the bill.
Quit blaming John McCain for failure to keep your majority, in the majority.
Take a look at these articles -
Bill Dyer at Townhall &#8211; Elections have Consequences
Hugh [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.faithandfacts.com/2008/09/29/democrats-kill-bailout/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
