<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Look Who’s the Hypocrite NOW</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.faithandfacts.com/abortion/look-who%e2%80%99s-the-hypocrite-now/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.faithandfacts.com/abortion/look-who%e2%80%99s-the-hypocrite-now/</link>
	<description>Exploring the intersectio between personal faith and public life.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 15:59:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Makayla Gonzalez</title>
		<link>http://www.faithandfacts.com/abortion/look-who%e2%80%99s-the-hypocrite-now/comment-page-1/#comment-1663</link>
		<dc:creator>Makayla Gonzalez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 17:58:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.faithandfacts.com/2008/10/05/look-who%e2%80%99s-the-hypocrite-now/#comment-1663</guid>
		<description>there are lots of women issues that are mostly related to relationships and family-,:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>there are lots of women issues that are mostly related to relationships and family-,:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meg</title>
		<link>http://www.faithandfacts.com/abortion/look-who%e2%80%99s-the-hypocrite-now/comment-page-1/#comment-343</link>
		<dc:creator>Meg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 18:47:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.faithandfacts.com/2008/10/05/look-who%e2%80%99s-the-hypocrite-now/#comment-343</guid>
		<description>Chris is right on! Just because she&#039;s a woman does not mean she is in any way an advocate for women&#039;s rights - including the right to choose. It&#039;s sexist to think that just because she has a vagina, NOW should support her.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris is right on! Just because she&#8217;s a woman does not mean she is in any way an advocate for women&#8217;s rights &#8211; including the right to choose. It&#8217;s sexist to think that just because she has a vagina, NOW should support her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Renee</title>
		<link>http://www.faithandfacts.com/abortion/look-who%e2%80%99s-the-hypocrite-now/comment-page-1/#comment-342</link>
		<dc:creator>Renee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 04:58:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.faithandfacts.com/2008/10/05/look-who%e2%80%99s-the-hypocrite-now/#comment-342</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Here we have a successful, articulate, intelligent mother of five as a vice-presidential candidate &lt;/blockquote&gt;

What did you miss her Couric interview? She is hardly intelligent or articulate. The woman does not speak in complete sentences nor can she mention a single newspaper that reads.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Here we have a successful, articulate, intelligent mother of five as a vice-presidential candidate </p></blockquote>
<p>What did you miss her Couric interview? She is hardly intelligent or articulate. The woman does not speak in complete sentences nor can she mention a single newspaper that reads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.faithandfacts.com/abortion/look-who%e2%80%99s-the-hypocrite-now/comment-page-1/#comment-341</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 02:51:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.faithandfacts.com/2008/10/05/look-who%e2%80%99s-the-hypocrite-now/#comment-341</guid>
		<description>What are you talking about Humbled Infidel?

what part of
&gt; They have supported a woman’s right to choose things other than abortion
and
&gt; They do promote abstinence, safe sex and adoption
and
&gt; They also support more general equal rights, and fight for slimming the wage gap, etc

Made me sound like they were only interested in abortion?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are you talking about Humbled Infidel?</p>
<p>what part of<br />
&gt; They have supported a woman’s right to choose things other than abortion<br />
and<br />
&gt; They do promote abstinence, safe sex and adoption<br />
and<br />
&gt; They also support more general equal rights, and fight for slimming the wage gap, etc</p>
<p>Made me sound like they were only interested in abortion?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Humbled Infidel</title>
		<link>http://www.faithandfacts.com/abortion/look-who%e2%80%99s-the-hypocrite-now/comment-page-1/#comment-340</link>
		<dc:creator>Humbled Infidel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 00:48:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.faithandfacts.com/2008/10/05/look-who%e2%80%99s-the-hypocrite-now/#comment-340</guid>
		<description>So according to Chris Now is only about pro-abortion. I would have thought NOW: National Organization of Women would be about women&#039;s issues, but thanks to Chris I know they are only about promoting abortion. Sad</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So according to Chris Now is only about pro-abortion. I would have thought NOW: National Organization of Women would be about women&#8217;s issues, but thanks to Chris I know they are only about promoting abortion. Sad</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr.Bruce</title>
		<link>http://www.faithandfacts.com/abortion/look-who%e2%80%99s-the-hypocrite-now/comment-page-1/#comment-339</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr.Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 19:56:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.faithandfacts.com/2008/10/05/look-who%e2%80%99s-the-hypocrite-now/#comment-339</guid>
		<description>CA NOW,

Where in the article that you link to does it present any statement that denounces the sexism  that has been directed at Sarah Palin?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CA NOW,</p>
<p>Where in the article that you link to does it present any statement that denounces the sexism  that has been directed at Sarah Palin?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.faithandfacts.com/abortion/look-who%e2%80%99s-the-hypocrite-now/comment-page-1/#comment-338</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 17:32:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.faithandfacts.com/2008/10/05/look-who%e2%80%99s-the-hypocrite-now/#comment-338</guid>
		<description>They have supported a woman&#039;s right to choose things other than abortion.

They do promote abstinence, safe sex and adoption, but since those aren&#039;t under the same sort of &quot;attacks&quot;, the abortion stuff gets more attention.

They also support more general equal rights, and fight for slimming the wage gap, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They have supported a woman&#8217;s right to choose things other than abortion.</p>
<p>They do promote abstinence, safe sex and adoption, but since those aren&#8217;t under the same sort of &#8220;attacks&#8221;, the abortion stuff gets more attention.</p>
<p>They also support more general equal rights, and fight for slimming the wage gap, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CA NOW</title>
		<link>http://www.faithandfacts.com/abortion/look-who%e2%80%99s-the-hypocrite-now/comment-page-1/#comment-337</link>
		<dc:creator>CA NOW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 04:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.faithandfacts.com/2008/10/05/look-who%e2%80%99s-the-hypocrite-now/#comment-337</guid>
		<description>California NOW has issued a statement reaffirming support for Obama/Biden and repudiating Shelly Mandell&#039;s support of Palin.

California NOW has also been at the forefront of calling out sexism against Palin, as you can see from the site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>California NOW has issued a statement reaffirming support for Obama/Biden and repudiating Shelly Mandell&#8217;s support of Palin.</p>
<p>California NOW has also been at the forefront of calling out sexism against Palin, as you can see from the site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr.Bruce</title>
		<link>http://www.faithandfacts.com/abortion/look-who%e2%80%99s-the-hypocrite-now/comment-page-1/#comment-336</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr.Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 03:23:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.faithandfacts.com/2008/10/05/look-who%e2%80%99s-the-hypocrite-now/#comment-336</guid>
		<description>Chris, wouldn&#039;t your view be that they should be the &quot;National Organization of Liberal Women&quot;?

NOW has never celebrated a woman&#039;s right to choose anything other than abortion, as the referenced article says.
They only celebrate women that choose abortion.

I would say Palin is Pro-Life and NOW is Pro-Death.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris, wouldn&#8217;t your view be that they should be the &#8220;National Organization of Liberal Women&#8221;?</p>
<p>NOW has never celebrated a woman&#8217;s right to choose anything other than abortion, as the referenced article says.<br />
They only celebrate women that choose abortion.</p>
<p>I would say Palin is Pro-Life and NOW is Pro-Death.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Self-composed &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Head of NOW LA Chapter endorses McCain-Palin</title>
		<link>http://www.faithandfacts.com/abortion/look-who%e2%80%99s-the-hypocrite-now/comment-page-1/#comment-335</link>
		<dc:creator>Self-composed &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Head of NOW LA Chapter endorses McCain-Palin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 03:02:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.faithandfacts.com/2008/10/05/look-who%e2%80%99s-the-hypocrite-now/#comment-335</guid>
		<description>[...] Dr. Bruce pointed out the hypocrisy of NOW on his blog earlier. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Dr. Bruce pointed out the hypocrisy of NOW on his blog earlier. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

