<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Single Mothers: The Unintended Consequences</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.faithandfacts.com/2009/06/01/single-mothers-the-unintended-consequences/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.faithandfacts.com/2009/06/01/single-mothers-the-unintended-consequences/</link>
	<description>Exploring the intersection of personal faith and public life.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 20:16:57 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Buck</title>
		<link>http://www.faithandfacts.com/2009/06/01/single-mothers-the-unintended-consequences/comment-page-1/#comment-7080</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Buck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 20:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.faithandfacts.com/?p=1917#comment-7080</guid>
		<description>As a single-parent child, I couldn&#039;t disagree more.  My father is a multi-generational mental and physical child abuser, right-wing religious superstitious nut job that thinks he&#039;s a genius and continually makes fun of people and plays tricks on them.  I would take any and all the supposed disadvantages I had plus many more to avoid having to have been under this guy&#039;s roof....ever. 

If it weren&#039;t for my mother&#039;s protective measures and personal struggles as a divorced mom back when divorces were rare, I might not have been alive today to proudly report that I&#039;m a liberal militant atheist who supports vast individual freedom of thought and action, and collective safety nets.  You people who think that your censorship and dulling the spirit of people somehow makes for better citizens is just downright sick and disgusting.  It&#039;s your conservative laws that broke the back of the black family, just like you did with the temperance movement.  Hopefully we are now seeing this and are wising up to the totalitarian sham.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a single-parent child, I couldn&#8217;t disagree more.  My father is a multi-generational mental and physical child abuser, right-wing religious superstitious nut job that thinks he&#8217;s a genius and continually makes fun of people and plays tricks on them.  I would take any and all the supposed disadvantages I had plus many more to avoid having to have been under this guy&#8217;s roof&#8230;.ever. </p>
<p>If it weren&#8217;t for my mother&#8217;s protective measures and personal struggles as a divorced mom back when divorces were rare, I might not have been alive today to proudly report that I&#8217;m a liberal militant atheist who supports vast individual freedom of thought and action, and collective safety nets.  You people who think that your censorship and dulling the spirit of people somehow makes for better citizens is just downright sick and disgusting.  It&#8217;s your conservative laws that broke the back of the black family, just like you did with the temperance movement.  Hopefully we are now seeing this and are wising up to the totalitarian sham.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Buck</title>
		<link>http://www.faithandfacts.com/2009/06/01/single-mothers-the-unintended-consequences/comment-page-1/#comment-7079</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Buck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 20:31:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.faithandfacts.com/?p=1917#comment-7079</guid>
		<description>Your racism is thinly disguised.  Decriminalize non-violent offenses and your numbers will trip all over themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your racism is thinly disguised.  Decriminalize non-violent offenses and your numbers will trip all over themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JudgeRight</title>
		<link>http://www.faithandfacts.com/2009/06/01/single-mothers-the-unintended-consequences/comment-page-1/#comment-5691</link>
		<dc:creator>JudgeRight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 03:47:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.faithandfacts.com/?p=1917#comment-5691</guid>
		<description>The single-parent child is a problem compounded now by the children of those families now reaching the third generation from when the trend started.  Further compounding the problem is the media (music+games+movies+etc.,) and gangsta culture now achieving popularity especially among the youth.  Another resource you may want to look into is Dr. Warren Farrell.  His studies focus on gender roles and cultural value for each gender.  In his observations, the men are devalued to the point they are prevented from being part of their children&#039;s lives.  Courts support this, culture supports this, and women support this.

http://www.bestinterestofchildren.org/

A very special article written by one of those moms who opted to do it on her own brings real clarity to this topic.

http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200803/single-marry

there is more going on here than meets the eye and the issues are so very complex we can&#039;t point to this survey or that survey but need to gather up a host of expert studies from the kind of experts who&#039;ve been inoculated against politically correct attitudes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The single-parent child is a problem compounded now by the children of those families now reaching the third generation from when the trend started.  Further compounding the problem is the media (music+games+movies+etc.,) and gangsta culture now achieving popularity especially among the youth.  Another resource you may want to look into is Dr. Warren Farrell.  His studies focus on gender roles and cultural value for each gender.  In his observations, the men are devalued to the point they are prevented from being part of their children&#8217;s lives.  Courts support this, culture supports this, and women support this.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bestinterestofchildren.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.bestinterestofchildren.org/</a></p>
<p>A very special article written by one of those moms who opted to do it on her own brings real clarity to this topic.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200803/single-marry" rel="nofollow">http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200803/single-marry</a></p>
<p>there is more going on here than meets the eye and the issues are so very complex we can&#8217;t point to this survey or that survey but need to gather up a host of expert studies from the kind of experts who&#8217;ve been inoculated against politically correct attitudes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lynn</title>
		<link>http://www.faithandfacts.com/2009/06/01/single-mothers-the-unintended-consequences/comment-page-1/#comment-5670</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 20:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.faithandfacts.com/?p=1917#comment-5670</guid>
		<description>This is the post I read to &quot;try out&quot; your blog.  Well done. It seems most of us writers need to add at least two cents, if not a nickel. Here&#039;s mine:

God&#039;s plan worked. Man has either dismissed His plan, or considered it and decided his was better. 

One aspect of this issue that I did not catch in the post or the comments is the effect of ego gratification on reproduction and family. Any woman or man today believes it is perfectly fine to create a single-parent family on purpose. Actresses want a child; they either have one with no father in mind, adopt one, or design one using a surrogate or in vitro. Gay or lesbians want children. They order, adopt or design one. 

Too many children enter homes because the homeowner &quot;wants one.&quot; They don&#039;t give up their day jobs, but they get to play at parenting. 

Society must accept single-parent status as equal to traditional families or the &quot;beautiful&quot; people would lose their followers. That one woman without a means of support could create eight babies to add to the six she had already &quot;ordered&quot; is testimony to the state of our public heart. 

Wild horses have more respect for their offspring than humans. They know how to order the herd in order to protect and raise the foals. Stallions do what they do and the mares are responsible and committed. Not so many humans. 

There will always be single-parent families. But now they are by design.

Interesting. Will bookmark your site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the post I read to &#8220;try out&#8221; your blog.  Well done. It seems most of us writers need to add at least two cents, if not a nickel. Here&#8217;s mine:</p>
<p>God&#8217;s plan worked. Man has either dismissed His plan, or considered it and decided his was better. </p>
<p>One aspect of this issue that I did not catch in the post or the comments is the effect of ego gratification on reproduction and family. Any woman or man today believes it is perfectly fine to create a single-parent family on purpose. Actresses want a child; they either have one with no father in mind, adopt one, or design one using a surrogate or in vitro. Gay or lesbians want children. They order, adopt or design one. </p>
<p>Too many children enter homes because the homeowner &#8220;wants one.&#8221; They don&#8217;t give up their day jobs, but they get to play at parenting. </p>
<p>Society must accept single-parent status as equal to traditional families or the &#8220;beautiful&#8221; people would lose their followers. That one woman without a means of support could create eight babies to add to the six she had already &#8220;ordered&#8221; is testimony to the state of our public heart. </p>
<p>Wild horses have more respect for their offspring than humans. They know how to order the herd in order to protect and raise the foals. Stallions do what they do and the mares are responsible and committed. Not so many humans. </p>
<p>There will always be single-parent families. But now they are by design.</p>
<p>Interesting. Will bookmark your site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ericka</title>
		<link>http://www.faithandfacts.com/2009/06/01/single-mothers-the-unintended-consequences/comment-page-1/#comment-3464</link>
		<dc:creator>Ericka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 16:23:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.faithandfacts.com/?p=1917#comment-3464</guid>
		<description>This is an important and complicated issue. It is a part of a larger social issue and blame is not and should not be a part of the issue. Thanks for writing this well thought out article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an important and complicated issue. It is a part of a larger social issue and blame is not and should not be a part of the issue. Thanks for writing this well thought out article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SheilaG</title>
		<link>http://www.faithandfacts.com/2009/06/01/single-mothers-the-unintended-consequences/comment-page-1/#comment-2261</link>
		<dc:creator>SheilaG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 00:24:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.faithandfacts.com/?p=1917#comment-2261</guid>
		<description>While it is true many single parents are great, and that not all married families are good, it is also true that those who commit heinous crimes are almost entirely from a history of broken families. There are rarely any married parents in the mix.

I blogged on this &lt;a href=&quot;http://tolovehonorandvacuum.blogspot.com/2009/05/root-of-too-much-evil.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;a while ago &lt;/a&gt;with regards to the murder of 8-year-old Victoria Stafford in Woodstock, Ontario. Everybody in the story--the girl&#039;s parents, the two murderers, even the murderers&#039; parents, were from divorced or never married families where cohabitation abounded.

It was tragic.

Married parents tend to be more stable. It is easier for them to watch the kids. Society has a vested interest in protecting marriage, and we seem to have forgotten that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While it is true many single parents are great, and that not all married families are good, it is also true that those who commit heinous crimes are almost entirely from a history of broken families. There are rarely any married parents in the mix.</p>
<p>I blogged on this <a href="http://tolovehonorandvacuum.blogspot.com/2009/05/root-of-too-much-evil.html" rel="nofollow">a while ago </a>with regards to the murder of 8-year-old Victoria Stafford in Woodstock, Ontario. Everybody in the story&#8211;the girl&#8217;s parents, the two murderers, even the murderers&#8217; parents, were from divorced or never married families where cohabitation abounded.</p>
<p>It was tragic.</p>
<p>Married parents tend to be more stable. It is easier for them to watch the kids. Society has a vested interest in protecting marriage, and we seem to have forgotten that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How I Make $300 a Day Online</title>
		<link>http://www.faithandfacts.com/2009/06/01/single-mothers-the-unintended-consequences/comment-page-1/#comment-2153</link>
		<dc:creator>How I Make $300 a Day Online</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 00:08:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.faithandfacts.com/?p=1917#comment-2153</guid>
		<description>Hey, great post, very well written. You should post more about this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, great post, very well written. You should post more about this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liane</title>
		<link>http://www.faithandfacts.com/2009/06/01/single-mothers-the-unintended-consequences/comment-page-1/#comment-2146</link>
		<dc:creator>Liane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.faithandfacts.com/?p=1917#comment-2146</guid>
		<description>I read a book entited &quot;Keep Love Real&#039;. I think it&#039;s very relevant to the topic since it defines how mariieage and relationships of recent times have more probability of failing rather than those in the past (or older times).

Relationships are very fast-paced (technology to blame?). Kids who gets into a sort of &#039;love affair&#039; gets younger and younger. The times are very liberated that&#039;s. Love gets too much of a personal gratification for most of us rather than to complete the &#039;partner&#039;s life&#039;,

 I think this is the reason why many single moms have turned to be what they are now. Very little are keeping a serious perspective about treasuring a relationship and making it ast as they put it &#039;a lifetime&#039;.

Of course, for the single moms, I think they really are heroines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read a book entited &#8220;Keep Love Real&#8217;. I think it&#8217;s very relevant to the topic since it defines how mariieage and relationships of recent times have more probability of failing rather than those in the past (or older times).</p>
<p>Relationships are very fast-paced (technology to blame?). Kids who gets into a sort of &#8216;love affair&#8217; gets younger and younger. The times are very liberated that&#8217;s. Love gets too much of a personal gratification for most of us rather than to complete the &#8216;partner&#8217;s life&#8217;,</p>
<p> I think this is the reason why many single moms have turned to be what they are now. Very little are keeping a serious perspective about treasuring a relationship and making it ast as they put it &#8216;a lifetime&#8217;.</p>
<p>Of course, for the single moms, I think they really are heroines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mihaela Lica</title>
		<link>http://www.faithandfacts.com/2009/06/01/single-mothers-the-unintended-consequences/comment-page-1/#comment-2109</link>
		<dc:creator>Mihaela Lica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:57:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.faithandfacts.com/?p=1917#comment-2109</guid>
		<description>Dr. Bud, 

I see you are getting some passionate feedback here. I think I understand and agree with what you are saying. Perhaps the intorduction was a little unclear and led some people to believe you were blaming all, or most single moms for these statistics. 

I know from reading your other efforts that this is not the case. These situations are mulitfaceted obviously. We all know that single moms more often than not have a touch time of it, alone, trying to make ends meet. I do agree though, that making all single moms into Joan of Arc, which is what some I know what to think of themselves as, is a problem. 

Aside all the semantics, I do not doubt the numbers, or least of all this administration&#039;s &quot;padding&quot; of key positions with super-duper liberals. Our PR news is full each day with instances of key officials headed in some far out direction which should take us all directly where we were headed under other administrations - down. 

Kids have a particularly difficult time, and I disagree with those who put all the &quot;angelic&quot; praise on mothers (or fathers) doing what they should do. Life is about necessity a good deal of the time, and daycare just might be one of those. This is a 50/50 proposition Doc. Whether a single parent family is headed by a mom or a day, each bear a burden of guilt in either not making things work out (either in or out of wedlock). 

A child coming home to a warm, safe, and nourishing environment is what is important. We hear stories all the time about moms that worked two jobs and raised wonderful people. Sports heroes, politicians, business people, and endless parade of success stories. So what is the problem?

One I can think of, is lazy, crazy, self aggrandizing single parents 8of any persuasion) leaning on anything except their God given ability to work and make things right somehow. True the world is unforgiving, and sometimes events make things seemingly impossible. Where there is a will, there is usually a way. So often, that way is the easy way out, excuses, booze, bad lifestyles, and the end of anger and hurt of what has been &quot;done&quot; to people. 

I do not think any sane person would disagree with your premise with regard to the degredation and decline of society in the US, or anywhere else for that matter. I applaud you for having the courage to at least point out these problems. Even if your message seemed inflamatory to some. Sometimes life is tough, so just take the message, receive the good in it, and go forward and do the best you can. 

Quit whining single parents, and do your job with all your might. 

Thanks sincerely, 

Mig</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dr. Bud, </p>
<p>I see you are getting some passionate feedback here. I think I understand and agree with what you are saying. Perhaps the intorduction was a little unclear and led some people to believe you were blaming all, or most single moms for these statistics. </p>
<p>I know from reading your other efforts that this is not the case. These situations are mulitfaceted obviously. We all know that single moms more often than not have a touch time of it, alone, trying to make ends meet. I do agree though, that making all single moms into Joan of Arc, which is what some I know what to think of themselves as, is a problem. </p>
<p>Aside all the semantics, I do not doubt the numbers, or least of all this administration&#8217;s &#8220;padding&#8221; of key positions with super-duper liberals. Our PR news is full each day with instances of key officials headed in some far out direction which should take us all directly where we were headed under other administrations &#8211; down. </p>
<p>Kids have a particularly difficult time, and I disagree with those who put all the &#8220;angelic&#8221; praise on mothers (or fathers) doing what they should do. Life is about necessity a good deal of the time, and daycare just might be one of those. This is a 50/50 proposition Doc. Whether a single parent family is headed by a mom or a day, each bear a burden of guilt in either not making things work out (either in or out of wedlock). </p>
<p>A child coming home to a warm, safe, and nourishing environment is what is important. We hear stories all the time about moms that worked two jobs and raised wonderful people. Sports heroes, politicians, business people, and endless parade of success stories. So what is the problem?</p>
<p>One I can think of, is lazy, crazy, self aggrandizing single parents 8of any persuasion) leaning on anything except their God given ability to work and make things right somehow. True the world is unforgiving, and sometimes events make things seemingly impossible. Where there is a will, there is usually a way. So often, that way is the easy way out, excuses, booze, bad lifestyles, and the end of anger and hurt of what has been &#8220;done&#8221; to people. </p>
<p>I do not think any sane person would disagree with your premise with regard to the degredation and decline of society in the US, or anywhere else for that matter. I applaud you for having the courage to at least point out these problems. Even if your message seemed inflamatory to some. Sometimes life is tough, so just take the message, receive the good in it, and go forward and do the best you can. </p>
<p>Quit whining single parents, and do your job with all your might. </p>
<p>Thanks sincerely, </p>
<p>Mig</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dominique</title>
		<link>http://www.faithandfacts.com/2009/06/01/single-mothers-the-unintended-consequences/comment-page-1/#comment-2106</link>
		<dc:creator>Dominique</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:05:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.faithandfacts.com/?p=1917#comment-2106</guid>
		<description>Sorry again...the above line was correct originally....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry again&#8230;the above line was correct originally&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
