Comments on: Look Who’s the Hypocrite NOW http://www.faithandfacts.com/2008/10/05/look-who%e2%80%99s-the-hypocrite-now/ Exploring the intersection of personal faith and public life. Wed, 10 Mar 2010 19:05:59 -0700 http://wordpress.org/ hourly 1 By: Meg http://www.faithandfacts.com/2008/10/05/look-who%e2%80%99s-the-hypocrite-now/comment-page-1/#comment-785 Meg Tue, 14 Oct 2008 18:47:48 +0000 http://www.faithandfacts.com/2008/10/05/look-who%e2%80%99s-the-hypocrite-now/#comment-785 Chris is right on! Just because she's a woman does not mean she is in any way an advocate for women's rights - including the right to choose. It's sexist to think that just because she has a vagina, NOW should support her. Chris is right on! Just because she’s a woman does not mean she is in any way an advocate for women’s rights – including the right to choose. It’s sexist to think that just because she has a vagina, NOW should support her.

]]> By: Renee http://www.faithandfacts.com/2008/10/05/look-who%e2%80%99s-the-hypocrite-now/comment-page-1/#comment-672 Renee Thu, 09 Oct 2008 04:58:35 +0000 http://www.faithandfacts.com/2008/10/05/look-who%e2%80%99s-the-hypocrite-now/#comment-672 <blockquote>Here we have a successful, articulate, intelligent mother of five as a vice-presidential candidate </blockquote> What did you miss her Couric interview? She is hardly intelligent or articulate. The woman does not speak in complete sentences nor can she mention a single newspaper that reads.

Here we have a successful, articulate, intelligent mother of five as a vice-presidential candidate

What did you miss her Couric interview? She is hardly intelligent or articulate. The woman does not speak in complete sentences nor can she mention a single newspaper that reads.

]]> By: Chris http://www.faithandfacts.com/2008/10/05/look-who%e2%80%99s-the-hypocrite-now/comment-page-1/#comment-654 Chris Tue, 07 Oct 2008 02:51:38 +0000 http://www.faithandfacts.com/2008/10/05/look-who%e2%80%99s-the-hypocrite-now/#comment-654 What are you talking about Humbled Infidel? what part of > They have supported a woman’s right to choose things other than abortion and > They do promote abstinence, safe sex and adoption and > They also support more general equal rights, and fight for slimming the wage gap, etc Made me sound like they were only interested in abortion? What are you talking about Humbled Infidel?

what part of
> They have supported a woman’s right to choose things other than abortion
and
> They do promote abstinence, safe sex and adoption
and
> They also support more general equal rights, and fight for slimming the wage gap, etc

Made me sound like they were only interested in abortion?

]]> By: Humbled Infidel http://www.faithandfacts.com/2008/10/05/look-who%e2%80%99s-the-hypocrite-now/comment-page-1/#comment-652 Humbled Infidel Tue, 07 Oct 2008 00:48:05 +0000 http://www.faithandfacts.com/2008/10/05/look-who%e2%80%99s-the-hypocrite-now/#comment-652 So according to Chris Now is only about pro-abortion. I would have thought NOW: National Organization of Women would be about women's issues, but thanks to Chris I know they are only about promoting abortion. Sad So according to Chris Now is only about pro-abortion. I would have thought NOW: National Organization of Women would be about women’s issues, but thanks to Chris I know they are only about promoting abortion. Sad

]]> By: Dr.Bruce http://www.faithandfacts.com/2008/10/05/look-who%e2%80%99s-the-hypocrite-now/comment-page-1/#comment-649 Dr.Bruce Mon, 06 Oct 2008 19:56:58 +0000 http://www.faithandfacts.com/2008/10/05/look-who%e2%80%99s-the-hypocrite-now/#comment-649 CA NOW, Where in the article that you link to does it present any statement that denounces the sexism that has been directed at Sarah Palin? CA NOW,

Where in the article that you link to does it present any statement that denounces the sexism that has been directed at Sarah Palin?

]]> By: Chris http://www.faithandfacts.com/2008/10/05/look-who%e2%80%99s-the-hypocrite-now/comment-page-1/#comment-648 Chris Mon, 06 Oct 2008 17:32:03 +0000 http://www.faithandfacts.com/2008/10/05/look-who%e2%80%99s-the-hypocrite-now/#comment-648 They have supported a woman's right to choose things other than abortion. They do promote abstinence, safe sex and adoption, but since those aren't under the same sort of "attacks", the abortion stuff gets more attention. They also support more general equal rights, and fight for slimming the wage gap, etc. They have supported a woman’s right to choose things other than abortion.

They do promote abstinence, safe sex and adoption, but since those aren’t under the same sort of “attacks”, the abortion stuff gets more attention.

They also support more general equal rights, and fight for slimming the wage gap, etc.

]]> By: CA NOW http://www.faithandfacts.com/2008/10/05/look-who%e2%80%99s-the-hypocrite-now/comment-page-1/#comment-647 CA NOW Mon, 06 Oct 2008 04:16:14 +0000 http://www.faithandfacts.com/2008/10/05/look-who%e2%80%99s-the-hypocrite-now/#comment-647 California NOW has issued <a href="http://www.canow.org/canoworg/2008/10/now-supports-ob.html" rel="nofollow">a statement reaffirming support for Obama/Biden and repudiating Shelly Mandell's support of Palin.</a> California NOW has also been at the forefront of calling out sexism against Palin, as you can see from the site. California NOW has issued a statement reaffirming support for Obama/Biden and repudiating Shelly Mandell’s support of Palin.

California NOW has also been at the forefront of calling out sexism against Palin, as you can see from the site.

]]> By: Dr.Bruce http://www.faithandfacts.com/2008/10/05/look-who%e2%80%99s-the-hypocrite-now/comment-page-1/#comment-646 Dr.Bruce Mon, 06 Oct 2008 03:23:12 +0000 http://www.faithandfacts.com/2008/10/05/look-who%e2%80%99s-the-hypocrite-now/#comment-646 Chris, wouldn't your view be that they should be the "National Organization of Liberal Women"? NOW has never celebrated a woman's right to choose anything other than abortion, as the referenced article says. They only celebrate women that choose abortion. I would say Palin is Pro-Life and NOW is Pro-Death. Chris, wouldn’t your view be that they should be the “National Organization of Liberal Women”?

NOW has never celebrated a woman’s right to choose anything other than abortion, as the referenced article says.
They only celebrate women that choose abortion.

I would say Palin is Pro-Life and NOW is Pro-Death.

]]> By: Self-composed » Blog Archive » Head of NOW LA Chapter endorses McCain-Palin http://www.faithandfacts.com/2008/10/05/look-who%e2%80%99s-the-hypocrite-now/comment-page-1/#comment-645 Self-composed » Blog Archive » Head of NOW LA Chapter endorses McCain-Palin Mon, 06 Oct 2008 03:02:11 +0000 http://www.faithandfacts.com/2008/10/05/look-who%e2%80%99s-the-hypocrite-now/#comment-645 [...] Dr. Bruce pointed out the hypocrisy of NOW on his blog earlier. [...] [...] Dr. Bruce pointed out the hypocrisy of NOW on his blog earlier. [...]

]]> By: Chris http://www.faithandfacts.com/2008/10/05/look-who%e2%80%99s-the-hypocrite-now/comment-page-1/#comment-639 Chris Sun, 05 Oct 2008 20:49:58 +0000 http://www.faithandfacts.com/2008/10/05/look-who%e2%80%99s-the-hypocrite-now/#comment-639 I'm calling BS on your pro-abortion argument. She, exercising her choice, wants to remove that choice from all other women. NOW is pro-choice. Palin is anti-choice. I don't see any hypocrisy in NOW not supporting her. She wants to actively scuttle one of their core beliefs... the right to choose. I’m calling BS on your pro-abortion argument.

She, exercising her choice, wants to remove that choice from all other women. NOW is pro-choice. Palin is anti-choice.

I don’t see any hypocrisy in NOW not supporting her. She wants to actively scuttle one of their core beliefs… the right to choose.

]]>