Comments on: Gwen Ifill Seemed Fair http://www.faithandfacts.com/democrats/gwen-ifill-seemed-fair/ Exploring the intersectio between personal faith and public life. Fri, 13 Jan 2012 15:59:21 +0000 hourly 1 By: GregE! http://www.faithandfacts.com/democrats/gwen-ifill-seemed-fair/comment-page-1/#comment-324 GregE! Mon, 27 Oct 2008 10:44:50 +0000 http://www.faithandfacts.com/?p=704#comment-324 Brit Hume would probably okay, he seems be a professional. Sean Hannity? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH Why not Michael Savage, then? Or Ann Coulter! Brit Hume would probably okay, he seems be a professional.

Sean Hannity? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

Why not Michael Savage, then? Or Ann Coulter!

]]> By: The Celeb Buzz » Blog Archive » Gwen Ifill Seemed Fair http://www.faithandfacts.com/democrats/gwen-ifill-seemed-fair/comment-page-1/#comment-323 The Celeb Buzz » Blog Archive » Gwen Ifill Seemed Fair Fri, 03 Oct 2008 23:57:54 +0000 http://www.faithandfacts.com/?p=704#comment-323 [...] I posted a lengthy article about the appropriateness of Gwen Ifill serving as moderator for the VP debate. She has a real, not just apparent, conflict of interest with her new book lauding the “Age of Obama.” Liberals would never accept …[Continue Reading] [...] [...] I posted a lengthy article about the appropriateness of Gwen Ifill serving as moderator for the VP debate. She has a real, not just apparent, conflict of interest with her new book lauding the “Age of Obama.” Liberals would never accept …[Continue Reading] [...]

]]> By: Dr.Bruce http://www.faithandfacts.com/democrats/gwen-ifill-seemed-fair/comment-page-1/#comment-322 Dr.Bruce Fri, 03 Oct 2008 20:58:46 +0000 http://www.faithandfacts.com/?p=704#comment-322 Hi Edson, I did not reluctantly admit anything. I rightly criticized the clear conflict of interest. Ifill should not have been the moderator. Liberals would never have allowed a Conservative with the same conflict to moderate a debate and even if they would it is not right. Having made my objection clear, I pointed out that in my opinion Ms. Ifill did an even-handed job with the debate. I have not found one conservative writer saying that today so I believe it actually a good thing to point out. I does not remove the conflict however. Perhaps you missed the "tongue-in-cheek" nature of suggesting Rush Limbaugh as a moderator. That would, of course, present the same conflict of interest and would be unacceptable to me. Thanks for adding to the discussion. Blessings! Hi Edson,

I did not reluctantly admit anything.

I rightly criticized the clear conflict of interest. Ifill should not have been the moderator. Liberals would never have allowed a Conservative with the same conflict to moderate a debate and even if they would it is not right.

Having made my objection clear, I pointed out that in my opinion Ms. Ifill did an even-handed job with the debate. I have not found one conservative writer saying that today so I believe it actually a good thing to point out. I does not remove the conflict however.

Perhaps you missed the “tongue-in-cheek” nature of suggesting Rush Limbaugh as a moderator. That would, of course, present the same conflict of interest and would be unacceptable to me.

Thanks for adding to the discussion.

Blessings!

]]> By: Edson http://www.faithandfacts.com/democrats/gwen-ifill-seemed-fair/comment-page-1/#comment-321 Edson Fri, 03 Oct 2008 19:58:55 +0000 http://www.faithandfacts.com/?p=704#comment-321 Jeez, 4/5 of this article was crabbing and moaning about a conflict of interest. Then the author reluctantly admits that IFill was apparently fair and even handed in her role as debate moderator. She acted professionally. Isn't that what we expect folks to do, regardless of who they otherwise drool for? Jeez, 4/5 of this article was crabbing and moaning about a conflict of interest. Then the author reluctantly admits that IFill was apparently fair and even handed in her role as debate moderator. She acted professionally. Isn’t that what we expect folks to do, regardless of who they otherwise drool for?

]]>